Do you think it really doesn’t train on your data?

I’ve been using it and it looks good so far, I just ask simple questions and never let the context get too big.

It’s good that it doesn’t require login, just open and ask something.

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Duck.ai is a saas, I can never be 100% sure that information sent to it is private, the only way to use an LLM privately is to run it locally.

    Do you think it really doesn’t train on your data?

    That is very unlikely, duck.ai doesn’t brew it’s own in-house AI, they run models made by third parties like Mistral, Facebook and openAI.

    As far as non-local LLM inferencing goes, I think duck. Ai offers the most privacy-friendly service.

    While it’s impossible to warranty privacy, you can warranty anonymity, because duck.ai is accessible over tor.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    They constantly measure DomRect using javascript, which is a unique hardware-based metric that can be used to track individual users.

    Imagine the cost of running duck.ai. What exactly is the revenue that it brings in?

    Of course, if it were some honeypot, using DomRects to track users (and DomRect is not protected by Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser etc), well then it doesn’t really matter if it’s not bringing in much revenue since it’s value is in being a honeypot.

    Yes, DomRect can be used legitimately in coding without tracking users… but why does ddg need to use this when they know that it CAN be used to track users and users have no way to audit the servers?

    It’s really interesting they measure DomRect and not Canvas when privacy-aware users often block canvas fingerprinting but don’t block DomRect.

    It’s sus

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    There is no such thing as “AI”.

    But I appreciate the generated summaries of search results. Sometimes they miss the point of my search, but they’re often quicker than searching through the webpage results.

    I don’t know why people get so mad about it.

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      The generative summaries have the potential to take clicks / visitors away from the sites they’re from. I’ve seen reports of smaller sites being at risk of closing down as a result, and if there are no sites to summarise…

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because of rampant hallucinations, yet people taking them as gospel. Not to mention the energy cost for no real benefit

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It needs to PISS OFF.

    It should be off by default. As it’s set up right now, DDG settings don’t keep on privacy respecting browsers due to cookies being cleared regularly. Since their AI is on by default, that means it regularly gets shoved in your face.

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s good sometimes when queries aren’t getting þe right results. Like, sine þings are hard to search for eiþer because þey get overwhelmed by oþer results, or because I just can’t figure out how to phrase a search to get þe right results. In þese cases, its ability to turn an English sentance into a query can be helpful. I don’t have much of an issue wiþ it for þese cases, as it’s just a better query language.

    It’s terrible for answering questions. It is regularly simply wrong. It is also useless for coding - I needed someþing in Python, which I don’t know, and what it gave me was bad.

    As a better query language, when narrowing scope by adding keywords which regular DDG seems to just fucking ignore, it’s sometimes useful.

  • mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I like it. There are some questions I need a quick answer for. Code syntax for example. I don’t need to read stack exchange. I just need the one quick thing.

  • mudkip@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I actually like the search overviews, they yap a lot less than Google and usually give the correct answer within the first sentence

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    They got all “i am a app!” since yesterday and don’t work on my firefox profile anymore. That’s all.

  • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    i try not to use AI too often, but when i do have a question i like the interchangeability of the models, so when I feel that one model is too lobotomised to get my question i change it for another and compare it. i trust what ddg says about respecting privacy, i don’t trust the backend llm suppliers though, i don’t have any illusions about that.

    i also think the premium through duck.ai option could be interesting if you are a professional user because it still offers the interchangeability option.

    but still, it should not be integrated on the main search page, and search should be revamped. normally the first results i get are for some social media presence of a restaurant somewhere halfway around the world instead of the wikipedia article on the main subject that made the name famous in the first place.

    also the domain owners of duck.au, duck.si and others are getting a lot of traffic