• Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you want to do work with the GPU you’re still buying NVIDIA. Particularly 3D animation, video/film editing, and creative tools. Even FOSS tools like GIMP and Krita prefer NVIDIA for GPU accelerated functions.

    • FirmDistribution@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I wish there were more laptops using AMD gpus here in Brazil. You basically can’t find any laptop with an AMD gpu if you search for “gamer laptop” in Brazilian stores.

      • MasterNerd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Gaming laptops are a not really worth it imo. They’re underpowered, overheat easily, and tend to break quickly. That doesn’t even touch on their battery life, even when not under load.I’d recommend getting a steam deck if you really need the portability, but it doesn’t look like they’re available in Brazil :/

        • FirmDistribution@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’d recommend getting a steam deck

          Nah. I want the 15.6 inch screen screen and the keyboard and touch pad that comes with it. The steam deck is too small and I think it’s a little expensive here (Valve is not officially selling in Brazil as far as I know).

          EDIT: didn’t see you already mentioned them not being sold here. I think no third world country has the deck being officially sold for them.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Steam deck and a gaming laptop don’t have the same niche. Laptop is great when you don’t have a permanent spot to setup a gaming computer, or traveling a lot for example, but still want to enjoy full experience. Deck is more for playing “on the go” so to speak.
          Buying gaming laptop was the best decision for me

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    While AMD is no angel, I’m glad I went for Radeon RX 9070 XT this time. Really good GPU and fuck NVIDIA. I hope unified RDNA5 will work out for AMD.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I went with Intel ARC since I don’t actually need GPU processing power so much as a decent media engine and VRAM for future projects and Intel has that ready to go under Linux. In the CPU side AMD is the only option that makes sense and for gaming AMDs GPUs have already been the practical option for years but their media engines are trash.

      But we don’t need NVIDIA and we don’t even need high end GPUs as much as we think we do.

  • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We’re running straight into a future where consumers’ only option for computers are a cloud solution like MS 365

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    i really hope nvidia collapses when the AI bubble pops. They’ve been more harm than good for consumers for too long.

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It won’t collapse. It’ll lose a huge chunk of its stock price, but it both has other business to fall back on and its chips will still likely be used in whatever the next tech trend is - probably neural network AI or something.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I am not sure. They have other businesses but not sure those other businesses are able to sustain the obligations that nVidia has committed to in this round. They are juggling more money than their pre-AI boom market cap by a wide margin, so if the bubble pops, unclear how big a bag nVidia will be left holding and if the rest of their business can survive it. Guess they might go bankrupt and come out of it eventually to continue business as usual after having financial obligations wiped away…

        Also, they have somewhat tarnished their reputation with going all in on the dataenter equipment to, seemingly here, abandoning the consumer market to make more capacity for the datacenters. So if AMD ever had an opportunity to maybe cash in, well, here it might be… Except they also dream of being a big datacenter player, but weaker demand may leave them with leftover capacity…

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I know radeons don’t really have the performance crown, but as a life long Nvidia GPU and Linux user, the PITA drivers are not a problem when you use an AMD radeon card.

  • horse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    As someone not looking to spend a ton of money on new hardware any time soon: good. The longer it takes to release faster hardware, the longer current hardware stays viable. Games aren’t going to get more fun by slightly improving graphics anyway. The tech we have now is good enough.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      People don’t just use computers for gaming. If this continues people will struggle to do any meaningful work on their personal computes which is definitely not good. And I’m not talking about browsing facebook but about coding, doing research, editing videos and other useful shit.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You can write code just fine on 20 or even 30 year old hardware. Basically if it runs Linux, chances are it can also run vim and compile code. If you spring for 10-15 year old hardware, you can even get an LSP + coc or helix, for error highlighting and goto definition and code actions. And you definitely don’t need a beefy GPU for it (unless you’re doing something GPU-specific of course).

        Editing 720p videos (which, if you encode with a high enough bitrate, still looks alright) can be done on 10-15 year old hardware.

        Research is where it gets complicated. It does indeed often require a lot of computing power to do modern computational research. But for some simpler stuff - especially outside STEM - you can sometimes get away with a LibreOffice spreadsheet on an old Dell or something.

        From the looks of it we will have to get used to doing more with less when it comes to computers. And TBH I’m all for it. I just hope that either my job won’t require compiling a lot more stuff, or they provide me with a modern machine at their expense.

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Honestly it’s fine. LSPs are nice but you don’t need them per se. A combination of vim, tmux, entr, a fast incremental compiler, grep, and proper documentation can get you a long way there.

            A lot of critically important code that’s running the servers we’re using to communicate was written this way. And, if capitalist decline continues long enough, we will all eventually be begging for vim while writing code with ed.

            Personally I use helix with an LSP, because it helps speed up development quite a bit. I even have a local LLM for writing repetitive boilerplate bullshit. But I also understand that those are ultimately just tools that speed the process up, they do not fundamentally change what I’m doing.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Dude, I’m coding every day and I know what hardware requirements I have. You can write some code slowly on a potato but a lot of software development requires tons of RAM and powerful CPU. Linus Torvalds is using Threadripper 9960X for a reason.

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s nicer to develop anything on a beefy machine, I was rocking a 7950X until recently. The compile times are a huge boon, and for some modern bloated bullshit (looking at you, Android) you definitely need a beefy machine to build it in a realistic timeframe.

            However, we can totally solve a lot of real-world problems with old cheap crappy hardware, we just never wanted to because it was “cheaper” for some poor soul in China to build a new PC every year than for a developer to spend an extra week thinking about efficiency. That appears to be changing now, especially if your code will be running on consumer hardware.

            My dad used to “write” software for basic aerodynamic modelling on punchcards, on a mainframe that has about us much computing power as some modern microcontrollers. You wouldn’t even consider it a potato by today’s standards. I’m sure if we use our wit and combine it with arcane knowledge of efficient algorithms, we can optimize our stacks to compile code on a friggin 3.5GHz 10-core CPU (which are 10 year old now).

          • limer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I can code my stuff ok on an older model. I’m sure there are some stacks that need more resources, but I’m having a hard time thinking of which.

            Admittedly, on a laptop that is 20+ years old, I cannot surf the web AND run docker at the same time

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        But wait! They can pay for remote computing time for a fraction of the cost! Each month. Forever.

        I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model. AI popping would leave these big data centers with massive computational power available for use, plus it’s the easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Hopefully the AI bubble popping means they have to close data centers and liquidate hardware. Dirt-cheap aftermarket servers would be good for the fediverse.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model

          I wouldn’t hold my breath.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

          And ban undesired activities. “We see you’re building app to track ICE agents. That’s illegal. Your account was banned and all your data removed.”.

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            “Remain in your cube - The Freedom Force is en route to administer freedom reeducation. Please be sure to provide proof of medical insurance prior to forced compliance.”

        • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          This is true but at the current computer prices, nowhere near as bad as it sounds. I spend £100/year or thereabouts for GeForce Now, and

          • there’s no way I could play games on a £500 laptop that I renew every 5 years,
          • no way that a £1000 laptop could get me to play AAA games for more than 1-2 years
          • and sure, I could play games on a £2000 laptop, but no way that will last me 20 years.

          If you have a life and can’t play any more than 25 hours a week, the value proposition right now is great - there’s no viable alternative that allows you to keep playing AAA games for the equivalent of £100/year.

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Fuck, you almost sold me on GeForce Now. Owning is still a better value proposition for me because I get my games at… steep discounts.

        • lacaio 🇧🇷🏴‍☠️🇸🇴@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Remote computing is very expensive. It’s just the gated (owned by companies) LLMs that are cheap for the final consumer. Training a 2b LLM on remote compute will cost thousands of dollars if you try to.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            2B is nothing, even 7B is tiny. Commercial API-based LLMs are like 130-200 billion parameters.

            I mean yeah, training a 7B LLM from scratch on consumer-grade hardware could take weeks or months, and run up an enormous electric bill. With a decent GPU and enough VRAM you could probably shorten that to days or weeks, and you might want to power it on solar panels.

            But I haven’t calculated what it would take to do on rented compute.

    • sbbq@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      If consumers can’t get new gpus, devs aren’t going to bother spec’ing for them. This’ll probably just result in a stalling of tech you’ll see at home for a few years. Honestly that seems to be happening already. The leaps we’d seen in previous generations seem to be slowing anyway. Maybe this is just a plateau of tech for a while. Good for consumers when they accept that they don’t have to always be on the bleeding edge.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I want devs to write games for £400 Steam Decks. I don’t want them to write games for £3000 GPUs.

        There’s realistically no games that won’t run on PS5 level hardware. Every effect that can be done with raytracing can be done a little worse without it.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 day ago

    So that kind of means that the high-end AAA PC market will crash in the next years, right? No new GPUs, production stop for existing GPUs and rising prices for GPU & RAM in combination with inflation and a bad economy ensure that many people can’t afford a gaming computer. And that a lot of those younger gamers can’t afford to start this hobby.

    And that means a shrinking audience for games, which need all this GPU power. If you’re an AAA publisher, it kind of looks crazy to invest multiple millions into a game that you can’t be sure that your audience will be able to afford to play

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think it’ll have the opposite effect. Knowing the hardware won’t change in the next year, they don’t have to worry about making it compatible with the new cards. They can focus on building upon what they already have.

      And as someone that helped pick out a fantastic PC for my little cousin in dec last year, she paid ~500$ for pretty decent hardware, and so far, she hasn’t found a game in my library her PC can’t handle. Including “wh40k Space Marine 2”

      There’s plenty of hardware for younger people that want to get into the hobby. You don’t always need the absolute latest.

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No not really. AMD is still producing cards. Most people play on older or used cards anyways. Maybe like don’t make Crysis level Graphics but other than that one year of less GPU releases won’t kill gaming. Once the AI bubble bursts NVDIA might have lost a lot of edge over AMD in the gaming market and they’ll scramble to get back

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        AMD hasn’t stopped making consumer GPUs yet.

        OpenAI owns a good chunk of AMD and AMD definitely also want their share of the AI pie.

        I wouldn’t look at AMD as some savior that wouldn’t ditch consumers for big AI.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t worry, you can Stream It From the CLOUD™️ for the low low price of 6x what a GPU would cost you over 5 years.

    • xektop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yes, but think about the money in mobile and console gaming… PC gaming was niche even before that and we represent very small percentage of the overall gaming industry. Nobody gives a fuck about us since some time already. Now they just show it to us in daylight.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s a fact. PC gaming vs consoles is to gaming as Linux vs Winblows is to Computers. It has grown over the years, as has Linux desktop, but not enough to make or break an industry.

        It’s a weird world we’re living in.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s not as niche as it used to be. In the last 10 years it’s grown quite a bit compared to what it was 20 years ago when bad pc ports were the norm. Due to AI, I guess console gaming will go back to being the main way people game again.

        • xektop@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I agree with you that niche is not the correct word here, but comparing the market share to console and mobile we are like 20-25% of the gamers. That is relatively small in my opinion.

        • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Any sub 500 dollar gpu can play any game that’s not ray traced unreal engine 5 slop. Lots of games to choose from the last 40+ years. The only limiting factor is ram prices sadly.

          • Dustman0192@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            This is true. And services like Xbox Game Pass, ugh. I mean, it sounds nice in theory being able to play anything that’s on the subscription. But at the same time, you don’t own anything! Seems any and all companies are driving consumers in that direction…

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Way too late. This has been a talking point for a while. The AI bubble will burst but that doesn‘t mean they‘ll just return to their roots. Those new data centers need a use case and they need a good reason to keep building more.

          I guess the silver lining is that this plan B won‘t work out either so we‘ll have to see. But until then we better take good care of our current hardware. It will probably have to last a good while longer.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Definitely a shrinking audience for AAA games, but I don’t think it will be too bad gamers overall. Consoles will keep marching forward, as will Valve with the Steam Deck and Steam Machine.

      I think the highest of the high end graphics stuff has long since hit diminishing returns. You can do a hell of a lot with yesterday’s hardware and less-than-bleeding-edge process nodes for newer hardware. Consoles have never used bleeding edge GPUs and they’ve always done fine with sales (across the whole market, if not always individually). I think we’re highly unlikely to see a repeat of the 1983 gaming crash.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone is going to make bank by catering to consumers. Will the market accept nvidia back with open arms if/when the ai investments fall through?

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a Linux gamer, nvidia was already on thin ice.

      Also I had past them up on recentish purchases since they only really controlled the highest end of the market which I don’t have the budget for. So honestly I have no intention of welcoming them back unless there is literally no other option. You made your bed.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This is still a pain point for me. I have been looking for a laptop with an AMD GPU for years to use with Linux, but System76, Starlabs, framework, etc insist on only having Nvidia as a discreet option. Or is it that AMD does not have laptop GPUs? Could be.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is not an advertisement, but have you checked laptopwithlinux (dot) com?

          They’re based in Europe and I’m pretty sure they offer laptops with AMD GPUs, if integrated ones count. Not sure if it’s the highest end stuff, might not have VRAM, but there are definitely AMD laptop GPUs

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Because I travel a lot for work. My PC is way less powerful than my current laptop precisely because I spend more time in the road.

            • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Hmm. Even when I was doing graveyard shifts with basically six hours of just me and my laptop during the dead of the night, my desktop was still more powerful than my gaming laptop.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be nice. But video cards are a VERY niche piece of engineering. The knowledge of HOW to make them is locked in a handful of people, and the ability to make them locked behind a very niche set of equipment that will ALSO be exploding in cost.

      One does not simply start a graphics card company.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think a newcomer could do it, but a company like Intel is posed to be in a good position. They don’t have much market share but they have a good product.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem with that is Intel is subject to the same bullshit economic assessments as AMD and Nvidia… They’ll just as soon retool for ai as well.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Intel is arguably worse. They‘re in a bad spot right now so they can‘t do crazy things like Nvidia but they totally would and will go down the same path. I don‘t think US designed hardware will ever truly come back to end consumer products.

          • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Nothing will. They’re moving us onto techno feudalism. We won’t earn anything and we’ll be wage slaves if they’re merciful to us, otherwise most people will be in camps and dead, unless we stand up real damn soon .

            They’re actively moving away from the bottom 90% of consumers, it’s just not worth it anymore and maybe once it was worth advertising to us, but no longer. The top 10% owns 93% of stocks and control at least 55% of the market revenue as of early 2025, probably closer to 60-65% now, after tariffs, layoffs, and the nonexistent recession We’re all imagining and definitely isn’t real. /s

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Intel is partly owned by the US government now. You think they want tech going to the people when they themselves want them for skynet.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I get the disdain for GenAI, but are AI chips really the problem? Maybe they’re more expensive and price people out, but it’s not like they’re built on plagiarism like most generative AI models.

        As far as I’m aware, they’re just capable of running highly complex multivariable calculi in parallel, making them more efficient for AI applications, but wouldn’t the same features make them better for more realistic physics and other game mechanics like procedural generation, NPC pathfinding and behaviors, etc.?

        I guess it would suck for anyone who doesn’t have the hardware to play a game, but there could always be options to configure in the settings to make it playable, like “don’t use tensor calculus in game physics” or whatever

  • Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hey, I’ve seen this one before.

    Last time it was crypto instead of AI, but other than that it’s just the same shit again.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Amd is arguably more affected. Intels CPUs have memory built into it, and intel bought about a years worth of memory.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      More and more gamers are seeing Linux as the OS of choice so hopfully that will mean more interest in AMD as well.

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ll see statements like this thrown around, meanwhile the PS5, Xbox series X and even the upcoming steam machine are all AMD hardware.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Dude, I’ll trade my NVidia for an AMD card any day. Every time something goes wrong with my computer, the culprit is NVidia fucking things up. I’m sick of them.

      • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They didn’t have a high end laptop option when I was shopping. If they want my money I expect an 80 series equivalent in my laptop. If not, I’ll probably just end up with a 7080 or 7090 if NVIDIA still does it then.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I buy the card with the highest benchmark scores that I can afford. It’s not a political green vs red choice.