• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If your child steals a car, are you allowed to say “I can’t watch my kids all time time” and get off consequence free?

    Of course not. Do I think it is realistic for parents to keep an eye on their kid 100% of the time, of course not… But, I do expect that parents raise their kids in a progressively less restrictive manner and provide access to more autonomy as the child mautures? Absolutely, and I don’t think it is unreasonable to extend that progressive loosening of the parental leash in the real world to children on the internet. You shouldn’t have to watch your kids all the time on the internet, if they are old enough and mature enough to be on there unsupervised. If they aren’t ready for unsupervised access to the internet, then you shouldn’t allow it.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 minutes ago

      If your child steals a car, are you allowed to say “I can’t watch my kids all time time” and get off consequence free? Of course not. Do I think it is realistic for parents to keep an eye on their kid 100% of the time, of course not.

      I don’t understand how you reconcile these 2 statements. They can’t watch their kids 100% but also if the kid does something illegal, it’s their responsibility? You can raise your kids to do whatever you want but they often do not listen.

      If they aren’t ready for unsupervised access to the internet, then you shouldn’t allow it.

      Good luck telling your kids they can’t get on the internet. Remember you can’t watch them all day.

      Point is, if the parents are irresponsible, then who does it hurt? The parents? No. It hurts the children, and it hurts the rest of society.

      Your same argument can be used to abolish any sort of legal protections for children like gambling, smoking, driving, smoking, drinking, tattoos, etc. Everything should be the parents’ responsibility, right?