I would say, finally, in an era of bitter political struggle even in the free software world, finally we see a good humoured hacker joke again

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lmao there’s actually something kind of hilarious about a person trying to push gender neutral terms into documentation for a program called “Ladybird”.

    Did they want the project to be renamed to “Lady/Man/Thembird” too? /S

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        So wait, what does any od that have to do with Ladybird? The comment they replied to was literally about Ladybird… Ooooookay then.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        For some, sure. For me, no… I genuinely feel bad for anybody who’s head is so far up their ass that they fail to see the humour around the irony here.

        I am also genuinely confused as to how there can be documentation for a web browser that has gendered terms in it in the first place… Aside from the browser name, what other gendered terms would there be?

        • Chais@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          For example developers or users could be referred to with a default male pronoun (if the user wants … he can …) when, and that might surprise you, women and queer people do exist and do in fact exist and might even use browsers or develop software. There’s no need to be exclusive.