I wonder how many people using discord have this enabled by default. Pretty sure Krisp records everything you say and uses your voice to train ai models. Not that it’s a big deal since everything on discord is completely insecure and not private at all.

I’d like to ditch discord but there’s no way I can convince people to leave it, there’s really nothing as easy out there right now. They’ll put up with the enshittification until it’s ads plastered all over the screen.

  • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, no, Krisp just does that to improve the user experience. You’re being a paranoid conspiracy theorist. /s

  • INeedMana@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I haven’t digged a lot in that topic but when discord comes up I always wonder if network effect is the only thing that stops stoat.chat from replacing it

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah its nearly impossible to get non techy people to swap, and there’s nothing out there that can do voice, text, gifs, and screen sharing all in one. I already have enough on my plate convincing the SO to use all FOSS programs whenever possible and having them switch to linux.

      Nowadays if a program has 1 hiccup people freak out and run back into the arms of Google and meta.

        • CrocodilloBombardino@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          This all or nothing “complicit” knowledge is great for personal purity testing and useless for moving the needle. You don’t need to bring someone 100% into alignment with your views, you just need them to stop supporting one kind of harm or start supporting one helpful position (which will be diff for each person)

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s fine if you’re Stallman, but it’s not very practical if you want to actively encourage others to participate rather than just being an example and trying to preach to them.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            If I have to be complicit in order to encourage others not to be complicit, then what’s the point?

            • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              To establish commonality. It’s important to take precautions of course, but if you do not have shared experience and can confidently explain how the shortcomings you witness apply to your friends “stuck” on a platform (and what your proposed answers are), you are unlikely to change minds, because you are unable to reach the target audience. Also, there are ways to change the experience that can allow one to be a participant but not complicit to the entire ecosystem, such as using a modified client, using bots to allow bridging to/from other applications, or restricting permissions for the official client.

              That’s the frustrating part about change - it’s not convenient. To get people to change, you need to justify that disruption, and without meeting people where they are, you will never get the chance to make your case.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ehhhh, Krisp is the least of Discord’s privacy problems. I’d say start with all its monitoring of what you do on your system as low hanging fruit.

  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    very good catch, do you have a link to an article or something about krisp recording your voice? I couldn’t find one