• Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Highlighting individual cases like this is a good way to capture human emotions but the focus should be on the big picture. The moment a self driving car is statistically safer than a human driver it becomes the objectively better alternative. The fact that accidents will still keep happening nevertheless isn’t a reason to revert back to human drivers.

    This same “trick” is used in charity advertisements: starving kid will capture the attention of people but a starving village will not despite the fact that it contains that same kid.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can hold someone accountable when a person runs over a child or a pet. Who is the responsible party when a waymo kills someone?

        • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even if we replaced every single vehicle in the US with self-driving ones that are 10x safer drivers than humans, that would still lead to 4000 people dying each year plus many more being injured. “Who is responsible” is more of an philosophical question at that point really. It doesn’t quite make sense to punish the head of Waymo for cutting down traffic deaths ten-fold. The need to have someone to blame is something humanity needs to grow out of. Just like the need to drive.