• a4ng3l@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Weird shit can happen when one applies right to be forgotten. For some purposes data must be kept nevertheless (for tax obligations for example) while for marketing not (and even then some might argue legitimate interest and not fully deleted all instances of your data). And then the week after some stupid asshole reconcile invoice data with mailing lists and here you are.

    • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m concerned that they had some AI comb their database and it recovered OP’s email address, couldn’t find a matching name, but re-added it to the mailing list none-the-less.

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That certainly happens without any ai involvement… reconciliation processes are a very established thing…

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They just changed your username to DELETED?

    This would be funny if it wasn’t so concerning.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So many places just do something like that, since the data itself rarely can be deleted easily.

      • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Any halfway competent DBA could delete it from live databases easily. Your account is going to have a unique identifier.

        It’s usually done for compliance purposes regarding data retention.

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeaaahhhh any competent DBA would be crucified for doing physical deletion nonchalantly in an actual corporate environment… Due to integrity issues within one database or across several ones in complex chains. Honestly a lots of the times logical deletion is preferred anyway. And then that deletion request would be propagated via events and then, maybe, possibly physically deleted. What’s the point in those over simplifications ? Makes dba looks lazy imho which isn’t a nice thing to do.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lol, I don’t have a meta account, yet I get a newsletter (had oculus, didn’t agree to transfer).

    I am 100% certain no company deletes anything and just moves stuff to a shadow database, sometimes not even that.

    • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s usually just flagged as deleted, so the system shouldn’t interact with the data anymore. Often this is done for compliance reasons since some regulations require several years of data retention.