• amorpheus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    Housing should be more controlled, but "need’ will always be a fuzzy term if you still want to allow individuals to have different levels of wealth. Nobody needs a huge home, either. Two or three rooms, actually…maybe a little more with kids.

      • amorpheus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        So what’s the allowance for people’s homes in your world? Two rooms and one more for each kid?

          • ChexMax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            The need part…

            Do i need a home office? Do i need a living room? Do I need a laundry room? Do I need more than two sets of clothes? Do I need a room for my child when she could technically sleep in my room?

            Need is a very squishy word

            • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              We have more than enough to meet everyones needs - food, water, shelter, clothing, health care - many times over. Conveniences are things that are nice-to-have, but that everyone would still enjoy after all their fundamental needs are met. Hoarding for personal gain while other people suffer is hoarding. This is not a philosophically complicated issue.

              • ChexMax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                I disagree. I don’t think me owning a banana to eat is hoarding even though my vitamins and plain oatmeal would meet my needs.