The downside is not having enough supply right now, but once the logistics and tech is in place, even non-AI people will benefit.

Have you forgotten that they agreed to reduce production to stabilize prices? Capacity is not the real bottleneck.

Some days ago:

Waymo’s co-CEO has made a bold assertion that society is prepared to accept a death caused by one of the company’s autonomous vehicles.

Why?

How could this pass without a huge public outcry? All the developers in California, have they said nothing because they could be fired?

We already have systemd.

2025-03-13 Senate Received by the Secretary of the Senate

https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB2420/2025

It takes less than a year to lock things down.

How?

Hong Kong has also proposed new offences under the real-name registration system to criminalise the improper use of SIMs registered in another person’s name

Is no id card required for registration?

Why should the fronts have inflated prices? The AI companies can squeeze them at any moment.

It’s good enough to answer most questions and it will only get better. Even if it is not AI it is a tool that knowledge workers use and will need to stay competitive.

And looking at the size of EU investments, only China will build competitors so these companies will own the market.

Who is paying? If every workplace needs a $100 or even $1000 per month license then those values are justified.

The people using the AI are training the AI. In 2 years, no competitor can enter the market because they don’t know what to do.

Only Nvidia could be overvalued because at some point, OpenAI can design their own chip.

It’s like the original internet bubble. The predictions are right, but not the timeline.

However, it’s not decades but years until the predictions will be true.

They could sell the cleaned votes to AI companies and keep the dirty data public for the scrapers.

Companies are valued by earnings-per-share, independent of the assets. So if the P/E ratio is too low the company costs less than its assets and it pays off to sell the parts.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price–earnings_ratio

In this case I heard a rumor that Amazon did it to dominate the toy market, so losses could have been acceptable.

What can be done to let https://loops.video/ profit from this even more than mastodon profited from the end of Twitter?

But why? How is that useful for users? Why not make the switch when the hardware exists?

Why? The article doesn’t really help.

To threaten the status quo it’s bad but to have fun programming a browser it’s not bad.

That’s not bad.

You are right, but as you noticed, we don’t argue the same thing.

eventually killed the thing and forced MS to switch to Chromium.

Ladybird is not threatened to be killed by whatever anybody but the developers do.

doubt that a bunch of random developers will succeed where Microsoft

Ladybird doesn’t have to be profitable and the org cannot be bought.