It’s exactly as legal or illegal as it was when Obama was doing it.
If they don’t respect the 4th amendment they get the second amendment
Wow. ELI5 on Lemmy is way different from ELI5 on Reddit.
Laws only work if there is a penalty for breaking them. Example: it is against the law not to release the Epstien files … but what is the penalty for breaking that law? Nothing was written in. The same for ICE, no one is checking them and they are staying out of Castle Law states.
It’s against the Constitution for insurrectionists to hold federal office. Yet here we are.
Wow look at those big bois. I bet they go home, scream at their kids, then beat their wife and dog.
Kick the wife and fuck the dog.
Laws only work one way now.
Ah, the classic, “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” -Francis M. Wilhoit
This is very satisfying in a schadenfreude kind of way. I have been lectured to by Americans and those influenced by them for decades about the importance of their constitutional freedoms to shoot children and spread hate speech.
Some liberal western democracies don’t even have a codified constitution and still have better human rights and fairer government than the USA. Without a well functioning representative democracy with preferential or proportional voting, concentrating enormous executive power in a single tyrant without strong protections was always obviously exploitable.
I think a lot of them are still living in denial and think the good guys are going to come in and defend the constitution at the last minute. Hope they are right. It is one hell of a gamble for them and the rest of us.
The asswipes have yet to apply their SS and NKVD home invasions in a Stand Your Ground Oblast.
Minnesota supports castle doctrine, or so I’ve read.
The Constitution also gives Congress the right to a constitutional convention. This means that it can be possible for the US to become socialist by way of constitutional reform. Seriously!
Laws are only laws when they’re enforced. After decades of trading law enforcement to hate and fear the average citizen, they don’t care to enforce laws that exist to protect those citizens.
And don’t tell me it’s always been that way. It’s a matter of degrees and there’s been a effort for decades to normalize police violence. It was bad, but it’s been engineered to be worse.
The main question is how legal would it be to shoot at masked armed gang breaking into your home to kidnap you and your family without any judicial warrant.
Because that is exactly what the 2nd amendment is for
“Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6”
I mean FFS, at this point ICE might kill you just for fun.
Immigration proceedings aren’t before a full court with a nury. It’s an administrative proceeding. So, there isn’t even the 12.
I’m pretty sure the trial involving the self defense against armed masked gangs would not be an immigration court.
You guys haven’t really had rights for a while, by the sounds of it.
Naw but we got Mountain Dew buckets, cheeseburgers, and AR-15s in high school! Wooohooo!!! Thank Jesus I’m not a pinko Commie!!!
Black people been saying. everyone else just refuses to listen
(except for native americans, they been saying it the longest, they just don’t have the presence of messaging because they’ve been pushed so far into the margins)
You’re forgetting the “Nobody is going to stop me” exemption. The constitution is just a piece of paper if nobody is willing to defend it.
The constitution give you a right to organize 30 of your neighbors, armed with guns, and chase them out of your neighborhood.
You also have the right to put buckshot into the face of anyone who illegally breaks into your home.
Its not, republicans stacked the courts so they can violate the law and republicans in congress are cheering them on.
