• PortNull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The one good thing of brexit: UK isn’t beholden to this.

    The bad thing is that their own laws aren’t much better. And of course all the other brexit bad stuff

    • Matt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      From the Online Safety Act Wikipedia page:

      The act also requires platforms – including end-to-end encrypted message providers – to scan for child pornography and terrorism content, which experts say is not possible to implement without undermining users’ privacy.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I thought making calls and sending SMS was one of the least secure things you could do regarding communication? That secure and encrypted communication with messaging apps was the only way.

      Now we have nothing. 😐

      • dontblink@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        At least if you just do phone calls the attack surface is reduced… They can scan your calls maybe, but not your entire chat history with all of your contacts and give it to an AI which could profile you based on that + you are not scanned on everything else you do on your phone / locked into proprietary ecosystems.

        The ideal would just be using a Linux platform and using something like xmpp, but who are you gonna convince to use it? People use what they are used to use, if it’s not popular messaging apps is phone calls… And now it seems a more private alternative…

        • Matt@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Just get an Pixel 9a from a local shop, install GrapheneOS on it and use it as your primary.

  • DuskyRo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Welp guys, looks like I’m moving to [insert country without that sh*t] (TBD). Or atleast my router is.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The implementation is client-side, so this wouldn’t work. It forces all apps to have a client-side backdoor.

    • dontblink@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Xmpp, IRC, Matrix, all great decentralized alternatives, but good luck convincing people in contacting you on Xmpp…

      This problem is a problem because it’s a social tendency, not because we don’t have alternatives… Very sadly…

        • CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Hi Sorry can i ask what Is XMPP?

          Btw as a secure messgaing app i use simplex, mabye i Will look into matrix

          • visnudeva@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            It’s an open, decentralized protocol used for real-time messaging, so you can find many apps using this protocol, on android there is conversations which is very light and modern, just choose a pseudo and chat, no other registration, it is a paid app on the app store but free on fdroid. I also used simplex before but it didn’t work well enough, the video calls were laggy.

      • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Write your own E2E encrypted peer-to-peer chat app (nobody has got time for that) or use some that doesn’t care about the law (pretty risky if it’s not open source, I doubt they’ll survive for long in the open), I guess

        • sleen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          We are essentially manipulated into the belief that centralised internet is good and all. This is a push driven by the governments where the whole infrastructure is redesigned into essentially a police state where the only thing left is fascism.

          Decentralisation must stay, and developments towards decentralisation must flow faster than ever. If the whole premise of the internet gets breached then it will be officially over, and we will all suffer in oppression.

        • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          I dont see fdroid blocking the app. I think signal is in the guardian project repos. Anyway a repo can just be hosted in switzerland or on tor or something. I would be more worried about govenments blocking access to the signal servers.

          All this theatre in the name of protecting kids, Yet the pedo formally known as prince andrew is still walking free.

    • bjrn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Or Molly (alternative and more secure FOSS Android app for Signal), or Session or SimpleX.

  • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Dear mods, watch what you remove from these chats, our freedoms are getting fucked, people should be allowed to be indignant.

    That being said i hope the legislators sit on cacti all day every day, those fucking assholes are exempt from this bullshit.

    They will take my data out of my cold dead hands. It was a matter of time, sure, but I was actually holding on to hope for this one. I am pissed, dismayed even.

    Session, signal, simplex are your friends. If those give up the ghost and bend the knee then we are going back to irc and aliases. Fucking shit!

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Everyone who originally proposed this or otherwise helped in drafting this should be thoroughly investigated under suspicion of foreign affiliation. Chat Control doesn’t just start the EU’s transformation into a surveillance state. It also weakens its digital defenses. No matter how you look at it, this is treason both towards the European people, as well as towards the individual countries and the Union as a whole.

  • moretruth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Wow, this is bad. I thought this was over when Germany chose not to support it. Apparently not!

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I believe Germany is now in favor of this new proposal, according to https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

      Only Italy, Netherlands, Czech Republic and Poland are against. This seems to be based on “leaked documents from the September 12 meeting of the EU Council’s Law Enforcement Working Party”.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    For years the plan was to make this scanning mandatory. In early November 2025, however, the Danish government amended the text: scanning is now “voluntary” for individual EU states to decide upon. That small word change was enough for the 27 EU countries to agree on November 26.

    If chat control would have been made mandatory, you can bet (and i’d be willing to bet a lot of money on it) that you’re going to have AfD in germany and FPÖ in austria (since they’re already pretty anti-EU) making a lot of noise about how evil the EU is for infringing on people’s privacy. (And they would be right about this, as much as i don’t like to agree with them.) This would give them more votes, than they already have.

    Making it voluntary is a clever trick of the EU to not make yourself extremely unpopular among the population. Well done, i’d say.

  • dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Countries which support the implementation of Chat Control:

    Spain, Romania, Portugal, Malta Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, France, Denmark, Croatia, Cyprus, and Bulgaria.

    Countries that are undecided:

    Belgium, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia, and Sweden.

    Countries which oppose Chat Control:

    Slovenia, the Netherlands, Poland, Luxembourg, Germany, Estonia, Finland, the Czech Republic, and Austria

    • curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Can someone help me understand the likely outcome in countries that implement chat control? Will those governments force Google and Apple to remove apps that do not comply (e.g. Signal) from their official app stores? Will those governments somehow detect users who find workarounds and go after them? I figure most people in those countries will shrug their shoulders and move on with their lives, but how will this impact citizens who do not wish to comply?

  • fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    And here I was thinking the EU was winning its fight against authoritarianism. Guess nowhere is safe, everyone’s gotta push back no matter where you are. Fucking exhausting that they can’t just leave us the fuck alone.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      We are embracing authoritarianism everywhere. Democracies are dying.

      Politicians are not ignorant of the risks; as the article mentions, they had several advisors, including scientists, who warned of the danger. If our leaders didn’t know it, they wouldn’t exclude themselves from the proposal.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Sociopaths will be sociopaths. They’ll continue saying that protesting and violece are never the answer, while eroding our basic rights and ignoring all pushback.